Coach K and Coach Knight Analysis Paper

The three-skill approach consists of technical, conceptual, and human skills. Coach K and Coach Knight exhibited strong technical skills. The technical skill is based upon the knowledge and proficiency in a specific area (Morehouse, 2013). Both coaches employed frequent drills to improve the player’s techniques and skill.

The systems Implemented In practice and games were successful as backed by each of their records. The conceptual skill is an ability to work with Ideas, allowing a leader to create a vision or strategic plan (Morehouse, 2013).

We Will Write a Custom Case Study Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Coach K and Coach Knight had a strong understanding of the game and spent time watching game films and evolving strategies. The two coaches’ violin didn’t revolve around collecting All- American basketball players: it was based upon the team concept. Coach K vision involved team cohesion; with the coach understanding, teaching, and orchestrating the drills prepared in practice during the game.

Coach Knight’s vision involved the team playing in sync based on his coaching with not just a “will to win” but a “will to prepare to win” (Snood, Proper, & Delay, 2005).

The human skill is based upon the knowledge and ability to work with individuals to accomplish team goals (Morehouse, 2013). Coach K employed strong human skills during recruiting, coaching, and post-graduation. His family environment atmosphere incorporated Into his coaching allowed him to get to know his players personally, get them to work together, and trust him. When Coach K stated “We’re going to be great tonight” the team believed It (Snood, Proper, & Delay, 2005).

Coach Knight’s human skill was deficient. HIS team worked together like a well oiled machine during games: however it was out of fear and respect that the team followed. Often Coach Knight’s team, assistants, and media were uncomfortable around him. Although Coach Knight was dedicated to his players who listened, fundraising for an injured player and strong relationships and recommendations for ex players and assistants (Mike Skewering, Duke) in future Jobs (Snood, Proper, & Delay, 2005).

The Skills model of Leadership evaluated leaders based on attributes, competencies, and outcomes (Morehouse, 2013).

The two coaches had a strong knowledge of the game and their game strategies demonstrated an advanced problem-solving skill. Coach K had strong social Judgment skills demonstrated by how he treats his team, coaches, and Edie compared to Coach Knights weak social Judgment skills through his brash, Insulting manner. Both of the two coaches were able to motivate their team either out of trust (Coach K) or fear (Coach Knight).

The leadership style similarities cancelled Day Don cones Is Immune-to-ten-Roar management. I Nils style Tints a balance between the individual and the requirements of the task (Morehouse, 2013). The strategy and direction by the coach for the team is based upon the strengths and weakness of the players.

The two coaches had differences in coaching styles as well. Coach K has a team-management style while Coach Knight used an authority- implicate style. The team-management style emphasizes tasks and interpersonal relationships (Morehouse, 2013).

He got inside his player’s head, helped them get to where they needed to be as teammates, and invested heavily on drills and skills during team practice. The authority-compliance style places a larger emphasis on the task than the people performing the task (Morehouse, 2013).

Coach Knight wanted his players to be their best; many times it was “push-ups, wind sprints, insults, or Bobby Ball” that would motivate them to play better (Snood, Proper, & Delay, 2005). This heavy emphasis on drills resulted in many victories, but the insults in practice and games made for poor personal relationships.

As one player said though “When he’s calling you an gasohol, don’t listen… But when he starts telling you why you’re and gasohol, listen.

That way you’ll get better” (Snood, Proper, & Delay, 2005). In each case both style proved to be successful for each coach. Coach Knight’s discipline led to a long successful career with many wins, championships, and successful players and coaches. Coach K personality continues to have a winning career as the ingests coach in NCAA Division 1, championships, and leadership conferences.

The leadership skills models of Katz or Muffed and colleagues evaluate leaders.

The skills identified in each model highlight the abilities of the coach, but as seen by the history and record of the coach doesn’t define success or failure as leaders of the team. The leadership styles categorize the different types of leaders and which style might be more successful for each type of situation. Each of the two coaches were successful using their own style and leadership skills, however their legacy will continue to be defined by what kind of leader they were.