Vandalize Case Study

In international trade, the export by a country or company of a product at a price that is lower in the foreign market than the price charged in the domestic market. As dumping usually involves substantial export volumes of the product, it often has the effect of endangering the financial viability of manufacturers or producers of the product in the importing nation.

Dumping is also a colloquial term that refers to the act of offloading a stock with little regard for its price (Nonfat).

Some people will agree hat since there was no law that was broken why not dump products off on other countries that are willing to buy from us even if it at a lower prices. All we care about IS selling, making money, and keeping our business open. I however do not see things that way. I believe it is wrong to dump products that have been banded her in the U.

S on other countries that are willing to buy. If I know that a product I had caused harm, pain, or possible death to some I would not be okay with selling it and having the possibility of that happening to someone else.

I Mould feel very guilty and not feel right with myself. I would have to fugue out a different way to make money to be able to keep my business up and running. For me the way I treat people and doing the right thing are what matter more to me over money.

At the end of the day though you are the one that is going to have to live with the decision you make. Is there going to be a consequence for the action that you took and if so are you going to be able to live and deal with the action that came from that.

I know at the end of my day I would not be able to handle it if I know I was responsible for causing someone pain, harm or death. That is why I believe it is “iron to dump on other counties even if it isn’t braking a law. Case Study 1. 2 Moral principles are defined as the principles of right and wrong that are accepted by an individual or a social group (Austin).

In the reading of The DAD Affair Nee were should an example of how even though one knew something was wrong and it may cause harm to others he still went ahead with it anyways Just so he wouldn’t SSE his Job.

When in the end he ended up resigning from his Job anyways and he still put people in danger of getting hurt. I believe that Vandalize should not have work up the qualification report they way he did. If he was going to write the report he should have written the way he felt and believed it should have been written. If it meant he lost his Job then so be it because n the end he would have told the truth, he would have stood up for what he believed in and he would have gone with what he felt was right.

He also should have taken a trotter stance in having the company push back the due date or have been honest Ninth the way the test results were going.

My moral principle underling Judgment goes with what I think and feel is the right thing to do. I know that I do not always get it right but I do try my hardest to do the right thing especially if I know someone may get hurt by it. I always refer back to this example when thinking about doing the right thing. I work at a restaurant and one day saw a coworker drop a half rack of ribs on the floor in the kitchen.

These ribs already took a g twenty minutes to make and when I saw them drop I saw him look around to see if anybody else saw.

He was going to Just pick them up and put them back on the plate. I told him I know you are going to throw those away and he said, “no I’m not I’m putting them back on there. ” I told him I was not going to leave the kitchen till I saw him throw them away. He finally did and they made new ones, but I could not allow him to sever them to someone who would have never known.