Johnny case study

Johnny case study BY Johanna_285 Case for Critical Analysis GOLD International When GOLD International, a manufacturer of refinery equipment, brought In John Terrible to manage Its Technical Services Dillon, Company executives Informed him of the urgent situation. Technical Services, with 20 engineers, was the highest paid, best-educated, and least-productive Dillon In the company.

The instructions to Terrible: Turn it around. Terrible called a meeting of the engineers. He showed great concern for their personal welfare and asked point blank: “What’s the problem?

Why ant we produce? Why does this division have such turnover? ” Without hesitation, employees launched a hail of complaints. “l was hired as an engineer, not a pencil pusher. ” “We spend over half our time writing asinine reports in triplicate for top management, and no one reads the reports. ” After a two-hour discussion, Terrible concluded he had to get top management off the engineers’ backs.

He promised the engineers, “My Job is to stay out of your way so you can do your work, and I’ll try to keep top management off your backs too. He called for the days reports and Issued n order effective Immediately that the originals be turned In daily to his office rather than mailed to headquarters. For three weeks, technical reports piled up on his desk. By month’s end, the stack was nearly three feet high. During that time no one called for the reports.

When other managers entered his office and saw the stack, they usually asked, What’s all this? Terrible answered, “Technical reports. ” No one asked to read them. Finally, at month’s end, a secretary from finance called and asked for the monthly travel and expense report.

Terrible responded, “Meet me in the president’s office tomorrow morning. ” The next morning the engineers cheered as Terrible walked through the department pushing a cart loaded with the enormous stack of reports.

They knew the showdown had come. Terrible entered the president’s office and placed the stack of reports on his desk. The president and the other senior executives looked bewildered. “This,” Terrible announced, “Is the reason for the lack of productivity In the technical Services division. These are the reports you people require every month.

The fact that they sat on my desk all month shows that no one reads this material.

I suggest that the engineers’ time could be used in a more productive manner, and that one brief monthly report from my office will satisfy the needs of other departments. ‘ Questions 1 . What leadership style did John Terrible use? What do you think was his primary source of power? 2. In case Terrible have been less participative? Should he have initiated more task structure for the engineers? Explain. 3. What leadership approach would you have taken In this situation?

By Johanna_285 When GOLD International, a manufacturer of refinery equipment, brought in John Terrible to manage its Technical Services division, Company executives informed him of best-educated, and least-productive division in the company.

The instructions to keep top management off your backs too. ” He called for the days reports and issued an order effective immediately that the originals be turned in daily to his office rather announced, “is the reason for the lack of productivity in the technical Services 1. What leadership style did John Terrible use? What do you think was his primary would you have taken in this situation?