Should Students Who Engage in Cyberbullying
Rhetoric Leigh Uric Broadband university Everyone, at some point in their life has been exposed to or; witnessed some type of bullying. Since this type of behavior is traditionally witnessed, victims has a means of accusing the other student. Technology Is undeniably apart of everyday life, especially In that of today’s youth, Spellbinding has become a nationwide polemic due to the dramatic impact technology has on communication in our society.
Although crystallization for spellbinding would be an infringement of one’s eight to freedom of speech; it does not negate the fact that the victims of these acts feel violated and/or harassed.
Many times this leaves it’s victims feeling helpless and alone. This Is an infraction of ones rights as well. Spellbinding Is stalking and abusive, and therefore should be criminality. It Is a form of abuse can lead to other types of violence including murder and suicide.
The scope of student rights is to guarantee the of protection of students against improper institutional actions or decisions in such areas as academic freedom, due process, disclosure of records, discrimination, or violation of call liberties or thespians rights, according to the Institute of Education Sciences. These right’s pertain to all students.
They should be free to express themselves, in the same way, they have the right to feel protected and safe on and off school property.
The right to self expression in any form does not give one the right inflict hurt or pain to another individual. It has been shown that students are more likely to confide in their parents than In school personnel when they are victims of spellbinding; therefore, It Is Important survey of parents from three schools in British Columbia, Canada, found that parents’ knowledge of the newer social networking sites their children use was limited as was their awareness of the extent of spellbinding among their children.
Although 32% of these parents’ children reported being victims of spellbinding and 36% reported participating in spellbinding, only 11% of parents reported that their child had been a victim and less than 1% a superbly. Parents need to provide an environment where their children feel free to talk openly about their experiences online according to (Caddis et al. , 2011 ; Chou et al.
, 2013) School Psychology International http:// pi. Seepage. Com. V. Parents can help by asking if the school has an anti-bullying/ spellbinding program.
This will give parents of a cyber-victim or the perpetrator an avenue of approach to help combat spellbinding. Raising awareness in parents will better enable them to aid school staff in prevention. Together they come up with acceptable solutions and resources that are available to receive assistance, but also how to respond to both sides of such acts. Schools have to keep in mind the legal and political issues to take into considerations when find proactive means to fight hibernating. The dilemma with this issue is that while it may begin off campus it can easily cause problems at school.
When it does, principals can act based on the disruption that occurs to the school’s program.
But, based on the decision of the US Supreme Court in Tinker vs.. Des Monies (1969) you can only act when student speech causes a substantial disruption to school activities. Administrators may not restrict speech Just because they disagree with the student or find what they are saying it offensive. If the speech is a clear threat to school safety or to a conducive learning environment you may be able to act and discipline the student.
There are four test the courts normally use in determining whether or not a school can restrict students speech: Tinker Test (Tinker v. Des Monies, 1969), Frasier Test (Bethel School District vs.. Frasier, 1986), Morse Test (Morse v. Frederick, 2007), Westwood Test (Westwood School District v.
Quicklime, 1988). Clothier, R. 2010. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention provides suggestions about school policy and spellbinding for educators that can be found at www. CDC.
Gob/nice/depend/ electronic. Aggression. Tm from Electronic Media and Youth Violence.
There are a number of ways in which spellbinding can impact academic performance and school-related well-being, including: Reduced concentration, school avoidance, increased school absences, isolation, alienation, lower academic achievement, negative perceptions of school climate, not feeling safe at school, higher risk for school problems, and a greater likelihood for carrying weapons to school (Hindu & patching, 2007; 2008; Maracas & cone, 2010; Hobart, Dinner-west, & Leaf, 2007). Spellbinding not only effects its victim but also the school, the community and society as a whole.
The reduction of a students concentration lead to falling grades and truancy’s.
Many students are loners and avoid social settings. Some students feel so threaten that they start to bring weapons to school for protection. This is another issue, students with weapons on school campus. Often times students feel that the only way out is to avoid school all together or hurt themselves or their aggressor. In extreme cases the victim may commit suicide and do harm to their assailant to be free of the harassment.
Parents, students and faculty members bullying and spellbinding.
Both victims and perpetrators of spellbinding need to know that there are individuals and programs that could help with any problems they may encounter on and off campus. The rights of everyone involved should be protected. To that end all need to be aware of preventative measures and consequences. Whether the act occurs on or off campus, the aggressor should face consequences at school because of the fact that the victim feels the threat still remains even on campus.
Students should be held accountable for their actions and how such behavior as spellbinding effects their victims and others.