Farmingville Case Study
Too different from something to be acceptable or suitable,” and Illegal in one definition is “Not allowed by the law. ” (Miriam-Webster Dictionary) The words ‘Alien’ and ‘Illegal’ have inherent negative connotations.
A person does not need to know the intimate or factual circumstances associated with those words to understand their symbolism. When those words are used to label the social group of undocumented Latino day laborers the inherent reaction is to see them in a negative way.
The Individuals become a stigmatize group. The people against undocumented Immigrants In Fragmentarily saw the Latino through the lens of the stigmatize group “illegal aliens. ” They thus became seen as invaders, unwanted and dangerous. The people of Fragmentarily did not understand the Latino day laborers and were unable to properly interact with them.
2. Through conflict theory it may be seen that Fragmentarily residents were proactively willing to strike out (create conflict) to maintain assurance of their power and rights as American citizens.
Both on a smaller communal level and for American society as a whole. The Illegal immigrants were perceived as a threat to losing their power. The threat created a justification and necessity in their minds for conflict and thus stigmatize the group. 3.
After defining the problem and creating a hypothesis I would use a standardized survey. After a pilot study I would perhaps use a sample of 2 to 3 thousand people to survey. I would choose to do random sampling. 4. The surveys are limited to willingness of people to participate.
If people aren’t willing, the survey can’t happen.
Surveys can’t really go Into much depth In their subject. One way to overcome the limitation of participant willingness is to pay participants. Utilizing the internet, which is quick and easier for most people, and widely accessible, can help. 5.
There was a huge increase in births after world war two which led to the generation called the “baby boomers. ” The birth rate was so high compared to the future generations that It created a population Imbalance. The people from the baby boomer generation are all nearing, if not already in, retirement and old age.
Over the next 20 years the amount of elderly people of retirement age is supposed to increase somewhere around 50%. Because of this imbalance there will be a lot of money being erected toward taking care of the baby boomer generation which may lead to decreased funding for younger generations.
The baby boomers will all retire around the same time, leaving Jobs unfilled. There may also be troubles In the housing market as there may not be enough young people to buy all the houses they sell. The number of immigrants in America are increasing and replacing the baby boomers in being the dominating group in our population. . Immigrants are ten Inevitable solution Decease teen wall PICK up ten economic slack that will be left after the baby boomers retire. I don’t think that they are the best solution, ideally our native born citizens would be able to maintain our economy, but that’s not realistic.
Better to have immigrants contributing and helping the economy than sink into a depression. 7. Browning is the phenomena of the huge increase of Latino immigrants. The amount of Latino immigrants are outnumbering the amount of white and black people.
In Fragmentarily there were so many immigrants they were living 10-20 to a house, could be seen on street corners waiting for work and loitering at places like 7/11.
In short they were everywhere. The people of Fragmentarily felt like the immigrants were taking over. The immigrants were also taking a lot of the low paying Jobs, and that made the Fragmentarily people resent them as well. Internationally there is more connectivity between countries with businesses and Jobs and products. That contributes to Immigrants being aware of, able to and desire to move to the U.
S. 8. Identify the dominant culture and subculture in Fragmentarily. The dominant culture was the White Americans and the Latino Immigrants were the sub culture. 9. The day laborers experienced the culture shock of nationalism and racism.
One day laborer in the film commented on how people would drive by and yell at them, when they were Just trying to work, and that he did not understand it. The Fragmentarily residents were culture shocked by the amount of immigrants and how prevalent they were everywhere and their noisiness.
One lady mentioned that she couldn’t go to 7/1 1 without seeing a day laborer. There was a language barrier as well and conflict could have risen out of misunderstandings and inability to communicate properly. 10.
Some of the people commented that there were too many day laborers living together per single houses. While that may have been common in Latino culture, the Americans were not used to it and therefore saw it as being bad. Having such a singular view on how things should be, as you think they should be, creates tension in any setting.
The people of Fragmentarily Judged the immigrants according to their values and disliked them because the immigrants did not follow their cultural “norms. ” 11.
The day laborers didn’t really try to assimilate into American culture at the point in time of the video. They kept their own culture dominant. Near the end of the documentary it showed the day laborers forming a kind of “union. They used the soccer field of a local park to connect with each other, not with the American residents. Though that showed the beginnings of acceptance between the cultures.
At the time of the film it appeared as though they were Just starting to build their own community.
The Fragmentarily residents who opposed them did not help at all, they rejected the workers in every way possible. The people who wanted to help them made attempts to alleviate their isolation, such as the labor center, but that ended up failing. 12. Essentially ten I-irremovable residents wanted ten clay ladders gone. I nee set up organizations to politically fight the day laborers. They did protests to attempt to intimidate the immigrants.
They would simply yell at them, or try to tell businesses not to hire them. They got angry at them for not speaking English. 13. Americans had a sense of entitlement and superiority and thought everyone should conform to our ways. Perhaps at that time adopting Spanish as a second language was seen as bad because it would have given the immigrants power. The Fragmentarily residents may have also thought that to speak the Spanish language would be conceding to the Latino presence that they abhorred so much.
They may have felt that by picking up Spanish they would be saying the immigrants longed.
As a society, if everyone were to start speaking Spanish as a second language, the assimilation of Latino immigrants would be much smoother and the lines between Spanish speaking immigrants and English speaking Americans would get blurred. 14. The united states is an Industrial society. Mexico is an emerging economy. 15.
The U. S. Benefits from Latino immigrants who make up a big portion of its low wage labor force. Without the immigrants the Fragmentarily businesses that required hard irking manual labor candidates wouldn’t be able to function, or would have a hard time doing as well as they are with immigrant workers.
The immigrants in turn send money back to their families in Mexico.
Thus both economies flourish from each other. The inter-dependence between Mexico and America shows how countries are becoming more involved with each other. Chapter 4 16. Solicitation. Were Fragmentarily residents and Latino day laborers likely socialized in the same way? Provide evidence to support your answer.
How might their different solicitation experiences explain some of the tensions between the two groups?