Gathering Research Data
The goal behind the proposed research is to find out the levels of job satisfaction among police officers. This is a result of the recent complains among some officers about the working conditions and remuneration. The proposed research aims at determining the extent to which the police officers are satisfied while maintaining law and order. The research aims at gathering adequate information that would help in the formulation of effective recommendations that will help to improve job satisfaction among police officers. Moreover, the research will assist in motivation of the officers and improvement of the levels of security because of the recommendations drawn.
Relevant authorities such as the government will get information about the research in order to improve job conditions. Therefore, the main objective of the proposed research is to find out the levels of job satisfaction among police officers in relation to the working environment and remuneration. The research will go with the help of structured interview method. This structure involves face-to-face interaction with the interviewee. Rogers (2001) intimates that the interviewer meets the individuals and asks them standard questions about the issue under research. These questions are similar for everyone participating to maintain the focus on the purpose of the interview.
The structured interview is convenient as all the participants are to answer similar questions. This means that there will be no room for distortion because this will maintain the main agenda. Nothing will divert the focus hence making it easier to gather the required information. In addition, it will be easy to compare responses because the answers to the questions always fix in advance. People will find it easier to participate in the interview as they already have guidelines on how to answer the asked questions.
It will be easy to obtain the detailed information about the area of research using a structured interview. This will present adequate information for drawing recommendations and suggesting the appropriate changes. There are several questions suggested for the interview. For instance, how is your working environment? Is there constant maintenance of your residential areas? What are your allowances? Does your basic salary match the amount of services you deliver? How often do you get days ff? What treatment do you get from your bosses? These questions are to gauge whether the police officers are happy in delivering their services. According to Creswell (2003), the questions are appropriate because they will form the stepping stone for drawing the recommendations to the concerned authorities. It will be easy to compare the answers of the respondents and draft suggestions about changes needed.
These questions are in line with the aim of the research that is to find out the levels of job satisfaction among police officers. Therefore, the questions are to compare the various aspects involved in the process of delivering the security services. Qualitative methods of data gathering have various advantages that distinguish them from quantitative methods. For instance, qualitative methods permit face-to-face contact with the interviewee. This is an imperative issue especially in the assurance of confidentiality. The interviewer is in a better position to convince the interviewee that all information presented is to stay confidential.
This allows for collection of valid data because there are the required levels of confidence. Liamputtong (2009) points out that the face-to-face interactions are vital. The facial expression is easy to read hence enabling the interviewer gauge the validity of the information.These methods allow the interviewer an opportunity to define the questions. The intended questions are clear in order to come out with the best answers possible.
The interviewer can substantiate every detail of the questions that he or she asks. This presents an opportunity for the most correct responses. According to Creswell (2003), the responses are to rely on in the formulation of recommendations that are to transform the given area Flexibility is a key advantage when using qualitative methods. It is possible to address various circumstances arising out of the process of the research to fit the required needs. For instance, observation is flexible because it allows one to get the different views from different perspectives.
One can adjust positions in order to gather the most appropriate results that would be useful in the process of making recommendations. Liamputtong (2009) observes that one may use flexibility in cases of interviews. The interviewer can translate the questions in order to benefit from differennt respondents within a given area. With flexibility, these methods give accurate responses because the researcher considers various circumstances in the process of addressing key issues necessary for giving the required information. Confidentiality and informed consent are significant concepts in the process of conducting surveys. They allow the researcher get the required information because he or she assures security to respondents.
The interviewees will deliver detailed information about the issue under research. They would be confident in their responses and give out accurate data that is vital in making the required changes. In addition, this may assist in collecting large amounts of data. Madison (2011) intimates that quality information would present the researcher with the opportunity to identify the problems in a particular area of research. Problem identification is significant because it will facilitate the formulation of specific recommendations and issues that need to be urgent action.Respondents are under protection when confidentiality and informed consent are adhered.
The protection of respondents from victimization is essential, as it will help avoid conflicts in the areas of research. Junior employees in various places of research will be secure on grounds of anonymity. They will not risk losing their jobs even if they present the problems facing them; their bosses will not intimidate them once they give the information. Madison (2011) asserts that the respondents will be objective and transparent in the presentation of the information. Accuracy levels will be higher because of the level of security that exists.
Informed consent and confidentiality allows respondents to maintain the subject matter. They will address the issue at hand without the fear that their bosses may victimize them. The researcher will have time to collect the most appropriate facts from the exercise. This assurance may allow interviewers get additional information on the various issues affecting individuals in the area of research. They will explore beyond the desired topic hence facilitating room for collection of extra information.
Therefore, there should always be adherence to confidentiality and informed consent in the collection of information in order to ensure that the respondents are secure when they present their facts.